added: 4 Apr 2014 // by: Music-News.com Newsdesk
Robert Smith really doesn't like the writing of Guardian Critic Caroline Sullivan.
Last week, the Cure played two shows in London for the Teenage Cancer Trust, putting on epic shows that ran over three hours and over forty songs. Sullivan wrote of the first of those shows, comparing The Cure to KISS, saying they were both "fan bands these days." She went on to say that The Cure could take a lesson from Simmons.
"Rock is about grabbing people's attention." They may be able to play for more than three hours without exhausting their hits, but they've yet to work out how to build up a show: song follows song ' an incredible 45 in all ' but there are few peaks or teasers, let alone much of the fraught darkness that got them here in the first place.
What really got to Smith was when Sullivan said that the band liked her review. He took to The Cure's Facebook page to express his disdain.
'I have it on good authority that the band have read the review and liked it.' Caroline Sullivan. WHAAAT?!!
SHE WAS COMMENTING ON HER OWN GUARDIAN 'REVIEW' OF OUR EPIC 45 SONG 213 MINUTE FRIDAY RAH TEENAGE CANCER TRUST SHOW
TO BE CLEAR ' AND ON THE BEST AUTHORITY - THE BAND HAVE INDEED READ THE REVIEW - BUT DID NOT LIKE IT!
THE REVIEW WAS ' TO PUT IT POLITELY - LAZY NONSENSE. swampy. numbing. yet to work out how to build up a show. GULP!!!
BUT WE NOW KNOW WHERE WE HAVE BEEN GOING WRONG ALL THIS TIME: Condensed into 90 minutes, this would have been one of the gigs of the year
WE PLAY TOO MANY SONGS! DOH! BUT. IS IT NOT VERY OBVIOUS THAT WE PLAY OUR OWN SHOWS (AS OPPOSED TO FESTIVAL HEADLINES) FOR FANS OF THE BAND?
THAT IS WHY WE PLAY A MIX OF SONGS, AND WHY WE PLAY FOR AS LONG AS WE DO.
WHEN WE GO TO SEE AN ARTIST WE ARE FANS OF, WE DON'T WANT THE PERFORMANCE TO END. THAT'S WHAT BEING A FAN MEANS. ISN'T IT?
WE HAD TWO FANTASTIC NIGHTS, PLAYING TO GREAT CROWDS FOR A WONDERFUL CHARITY. THE GUARDIAN 'REVIEW' WAS SAD BITTER JUNK
Sullivan didn't let it go. She responded to Smith's comments with a lengthy (double the length of the actual review) column claiming that the show would have been much better at a couple of hours.
The impact would have been far greater, freed of the mid-show sluggishness that afflicts the vast majority of long-form shows. The sheer slog of being onstage for more than three hours means that artistry is ill-served by marathon shows: most bands don't even try, with the exception of Bruce Springsteen and the Grateful Dead, whose six-hour mind-bogglers were designed as trippy sensory experiences.
She finished saying "OK, Robert. Buy you drink?"
LAZY NONSENSICAL CONTENT ASIDE; WE WERE DRIVEN TO REACT TO CAROLINE SULLIVAN'S 'REVIEW' BY THE BLATANT DISHONESTY OF HER ACCOMPANYING COMMENT
"I have it on good authority that the band have read the review and liked it." IT WAS SIMPLY TOO MUCH TO IGNORE.
HAVING EXPOSED THE LIE, WE FIGURED WE WOULD AT THE VERY LEAST GET SOME KIND OF A HANDS IN THE AIR 'IT'S A FAIR COP GUV' FROM HER FOR ATTEMPTING SUCH A BANAL SELF SERVING DECEPTION. WE THOUGHT THERE MIGHT EVEN BE A FAINT CHANCE THAT SHE WOULD BE MOVED TO APOLOGISE TO HER READERS FOR MAKING STUFF UP!
BUT AS COMMENT BY COMMENT SHE DIGS HER EVASIVE HOLE A LITTLE DEEPER, IT WOULD SEEM WE HOPED FOR TOO MUCH.
A SHAME. WE ALWAYS THOUGHT THE GUARDIAN AND ITS JOURNALISTS VALUED TRUTH?
'OK, Robert. Buy you a drink?'... gulp!!!
HONESTLY? ummm. WE WOULD PREFER YOU JUST REVIEWED WITH A TAD MORE UNDERSTANDING AND HONESTY AND CONSIDERING LINES LIKE 'Not as scary [.] as Robert Smith in full fig' MAYBE THREW A FEW LESS STONES? OR MOVED OUT OF YOUR GLASS HOUSE?!!
"Rock is about grabbing people's attention." REALLY? THAT'S WHAT WE ARE SUPPOSED TO 'BE ABOUT'? YOU THINK THAT'S IT? IT WOULD EXPLAIN A LOT
WE WILL NOW DRAW A LINE UNDER THE 'SAD BITTER JUNK REVIEW' EPISODE, AND SLIP BACK OUT INTO THE WORLD WITH A SHAKE OF THE HEAD AND A SMILE.
PREFERRING THE OLD GOTH DISNEY DICTUM TO ROCKER SIMMONS';
'WE ARE NOT TRYING TO ENTERTAIN THE CRITICS; WE'LL TAKE OUR CHANCES WITH THE PUBLIC'
More from VVN Music